<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
	<title>Camera Cops</title>
	<link>http://www.camera-cops.com</link>
	<description>Our New Surveillance Society</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 14:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>

		<item>
		<title>Maryland Says Red Light Cameras Boost Accidents</title>
		<link>http://www.camera-cops.com/index.php/maryland-says-red-light-cameras-boost-accidents/04/2006/</link>
		<comments>http://www.camera-cops.com/index.php/maryland-says-red-light-cameras-boost-accidents/04/2006/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2006 02:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Click Flash</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Surveillance</category>
	<category>Traffic Cameras</category>
	<category>Red Light Cameras</category>
	<category>Photo Cops</category>
	<category>Big Brother</category>
	<category>Police State</category>
	<category>Citizens</category>
	<category>Revenue</category>
		<guid>http://www.camera-cops.com/index.php/maryland-says-red-light-cameras-boost-accidents/04/2006/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	Anne Arundel County in Maryland has been running five red light cameras for five years, during which period they raised a fat $2.85 million in ticket revenue. Unfortunately, a comparison of accident statistics shows that the cameras have increased the rate of accidents.
	Immediately after installation, the cameras sparked a 40-percent increase in rear-end collisions, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Anne Arundel County in Maryland has been running five red light cameras for five years, during which period they raised a fat $2.85 million in ticket revenue. Unfortunately, a comparison of accident statistics shows that the cameras have increased the rate of accidents.</p>
	<p>Immediately after installation, the cameras sparked a 40-percent increase in rear-end collisions, and never looked back, with five-year increases in accident rates far exceeding a 10-percent increase in traffic.</p>
	<p><a href="http://www.beloblog.com/ProJo_Blogs/shenews/archives/2006/04/red_light_camer.html" title="Read Full STory HERE" target="_blank"><em><strong><u>Read Full Story</u></strong></em></a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.camera-cops.com/index.php/maryland-says-red-light-cameras-boost-accidents/04/2006/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Red Light Cameras to be Installed in L.A.</title>
		<link>http://www.camera-cops.com/index.php/red-light-cameras-to-be-installed-in-la/04/2006/</link>
		<comments>http://www.camera-cops.com/index.php/red-light-cameras-to-be-installed-in-la/04/2006/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2006 01:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Click Flash</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Surveillance</category>
	<category>Traffic Cameras</category>
	<category>Red Light Cameras</category>
	<category>Photo Cops</category>
	<category>Big Brother</category>
	<category>Police State</category>
	<category>Technology</category>
		<guid>http://www.camera-cops.com/index.php/red-light-cameras-to-be-installed-in-la/04/2006/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	New cameras will soon start taking digital images of red-light runners, Los Angeles police said Tuesday.
	In the event of an emergency, the cameras, which are from Nestor Traffic Systems Inc., could also provide live images, according to the Los Angeles Police Department.
	The city&#8217;s contract with Affiliated Computer Services lapsed last year and red-light cameras at [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>New cameras will soon start taking digital images of red-light runners, Los Angeles police said Tuesday.</p>
	<p>In the event of an emergency, the cameras, which are from <a href="http://www.nestor.com/" target="_blank">Nestor Traffic Systems Inc.</a>, could also provide live images, according to the Los Angeles Police Department.</p>
	<p>The city&#8217;s contract with Affiliated Computer Services lapsed last year and red-light cameras at 16 intersections were deactivated. The contract was not renewed because officials learned that 20 percent of photographed red-light violations were dismissed &#8220;due to <a href="http://www.stopphotocops.com" title="Stop Photo Cops" target="_blank">lack of clear evidence</a> to prove the violation,&#8221; according to police.</p>
	<p>The City Council has approved a $3.12 million contract with Nestor to install camera systems at as many as 32 intersections.</p>
	<p><a href="http://cbs2.com/topstories/local_story_094155657.html" title="Read Full Story HERE" target="_blank"><em><strong><u>Read Full Story</u></strong></em></a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.camera-cops.com/index.php/red-light-cameras-to-be-installed-in-la/04/2006/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Georgia Accidents Increase with Red Light Cameras</title>
		<link>http://www.camera-cops.com/index.php/georgia-accidents-increase-with-red-light-cameras/04/2006/</link>
		<comments>http://www.camera-cops.com/index.php/georgia-accidents-increase-with-red-light-cameras/04/2006/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2006 00:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Click Flash</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Surveillance</category>
	<category>Traffic Cameras</category>
	<category>Red Light Cameras</category>
	<category>Photo Cops</category>
	<category>Big Brother</category>
	<category>Police State</category>
	<category>Revenue</category>
		<guid>http://www.camera-cops.com/index.php/georgia-accidents-increase-with-red-light-cameras/04/2006/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	The Atlanta Journal-Constitution reviewed accident data at a number of intersections across Georgia and found accidents and injuries are increasing, not decreasing, as a result of the use of red light cameras. Cities employing these devices are, however, generating substantial revenue from their photo ticket programs.
	In Marietta, rear-end collisions increased 49 percent from 65 to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>The Atlanta Journal-Constitution reviewed accident data at a number of intersections across Georgia and found accidents and injuries are increasing, not decreasing, as a result of the use of red light cameras. Cities employing these devices are, however, generating substantial revenue from their photo ticket programs.</p>
	<p>In Marietta, rear-end collisions increased 49 percent from 65 to 97 from 2004 to 2005. At the intersection of Cobb Parkway and Windy Hill road, there were 108 accidents of all types in 2004 and 163 in 2005. Since their installation, red light cameras have generated $2.7 million for the city.</p>
	<p>In Duluth, accidents increased 21 percent, from 75 to 91, between March 2004 and February 2005 compared with March 2005 and February 2006. The city&#8217;s lone camera made $790,000 in the current fiscal year and should make a million the next.</p>
	<p>Eric Skrum, communications director for the <a href="http://www.motorists.org/" title="National Motorists Association" target="_blank">National Motorists Association</a> says the data show cameras are not working as promised. &#8220;These devices don&#8217;t increase safety at all,&#8221; he said, &#8220;I certainly don&#8217;t consider it a safety improvement when you have more of one type of accident and less of another.&#8221;</p>
	<p><a href="http://www.thenewspaper.com/news/10/1050.asp" title="Read Full Story HERE" target="_blank"><strong><em><u>Read Full Story</u></em></strong></a></p>
	<p>Don&#8217;t Let Them Take Your Hard-Earned Money! There&#8217;s A Way To Protect Yourself. Visit <a href="http://www.stopphotocops.com" title="Stop Photo Cops"><em><u>Stop Photo Cops</u></em></a> Today To Get A Can Of <font color="#FF0000" size="3" face="Tahoma"><strong><em>PhotoBlocker</em></strong></font>.<br />
<em><strong>It Makes Your License Plates Invisible To Traffic Cameras!</strong></em>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.camera-cops.com/index.php/georgia-accidents-increase-with-red-light-cameras/04/2006/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Police Cameras on Street Sweepers in Lancaster, PA</title>
		<link>http://www.camera-cops.com/index.php/police-cameras-on-street-sweepers-in-lancaster-pa/03/2006/</link>
		<comments>http://www.camera-cops.com/index.php/police-cameras-on-street-sweepers-in-lancaster-pa/03/2006/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 22:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Click Flash</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Surveillance</category>
	<category>Photo Cops</category>
	<category>Big Brother</category>
	<category>Police State</category>
	<category>Privacy</category>
	<category>Technology</category>
		<guid>http://www.camera-cops.com/index.php/police-cameras-on-street-sweepers-in-lancaster-pa/03/2006/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	Smile for the street sweeper. Mayor Rick Gray’s administration wants to streamline the city’s method of sweeping streets and ticketing motorists who do not move their cars for the posted sweeping times.
	Gray said Monday the city is considering adding digital cameras to its sweepers.
	Sweeper drivers would snap pictures of license plates on illegally parked cars, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Smile for the street sweeper. Mayor Rick Gray’s administration wants to streamline the city’s method of sweeping streets and ticketing motorists who do not move their cars for the posted sweeping times.</p>
	<p>Gray said Monday the city is considering adding digital cameras to its sweepers.</p>
	<p>Sweeper drivers would snap pictures of license plates on illegally parked cars, and tickets would be issued later, the mayor said. Those images would include the date and time.</p>
	<p>“There is no new policy in effect right now,” Gray said, but he added that a change may come later in the spring. “There will be plenty of notice,’’ he said.</p>
	<p><em>Hmmm&#8230;I wonder what else they will be photographing with those street sweeper cameras? Or what else they will use it for, in the future?</em></p>
	<p><a href="http://local.lancasteronline.com/6/21489" title="Read Full Story HERE" target="_blank"><strong><em><u>Read Full Story</u></em></strong></a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.camera-cops.com/index.php/police-cameras-on-street-sweepers-in-lancaster-pa/03/2006/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canadian Study Says Accidents Increase with Cameras</title>
		<link>http://www.camera-cops.com/index.php/canadian-study-says-accidents-increase-with-cameras/03/2006/</link>
		<comments>http://www.camera-cops.com/index.php/canadian-study-says-accidents-increase-with-cameras/03/2006/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 22:02:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Click Flash</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Surveillance</category>
	<category>Traffic Cameras</category>
	<category>Red Light Cameras</category>
	<category>Photo Cops</category>
	<category>Big Brother</category>
	<category>Technology</category>
	<category>Law</category>
	<category>Speed Cameras</category>
		<guid>http://www.camera-cops.com/index.php/canadian-study-says-accidents-increase-with-cameras/03/2006/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	An official audit of the Winnipeg, Canada photo radar and red light camera system shows that the city used misleading statistics in an attempt to cover-up the program&#8217;s failure to reduce accidents. Independent evidence cited in the report released to the public Wednesday indicates that the number of insurance claims for accidents, injuries and property [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>An official audit of the Winnipeg, Canada photo radar and red light camera system shows that the city used misleading statistics in an attempt to cover-up the program&#8217;s failure to reduce accidents. Independent evidence cited in the report released to the public Wednesday indicates that the number of insurance claims for accidents, injuries and property damage expenses went up significantly at sites using camera enforcement in the year following the introduction of the devices.</p>
	<p>Provincial law requires that Winnipeg Police Service conduct an evaluation of the safety effects of its photo ticket program. That evaluation claimed accidents dropped at the first twelve intersections to use cameras. Rear end collisions increased from 63 in 2003 to 84 in 2004 and 71 in 2005. Right angle collisions, however, dropped from 37 in 2003 to 15 in 2004 and 12 in 2005. On balance, the numbers looked positive.</p>
	<p>Police data for the entire city, however, showed no change in the overall number of accidents. This raised a red flag for the auditor regarding the effectiveness of red light cameras in particular.</p>
	<p><a href="http://www.thenewspaper.com/news/10/1036.asp" title="Read Full Story HERE" target="_blank"><strong><em><u>Read Full Story</u></em></strong></a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.camera-cops.com/index.php/canadian-study-says-accidents-increase-with-cameras/03/2006/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ohio-Valley May Put the Kabash on Traffic Cameras</title>
		<link>http://www.camera-cops.com/index.php/ohio-valley-may-put-the-kabash-on-traffic-cameras/03/2006/</link>
		<comments>http://www.camera-cops.com/index.php/ohio-valley-may-put-the-kabash-on-traffic-cameras/03/2006/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 07:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Click Flash</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Surveillance</category>
	<category>Traffic Cameras</category>
	<category>Photo Cops</category>
	<category>Big Brother</category>
	<category>Police State</category>
	<category>Law</category>
		<guid>http://www.camera-cops.com/index.php/ohio-valley-may-put-the-kabash-on-traffic-cameras/03/2006/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	City Council is poised to introduce a new automated traffic camera ordinance that could clarify any language thrown out in a pending ruling by Jefferson County Common Pleas Judge David Henderson.
	Henderson held a four-hour hearing Thursday on a request by attorney Gary Stern and his wife, April, for a permanent injunction stopping the use of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>City Council is poised to introduce a new automated traffic camera ordinance that could clarify any language thrown out in a pending ruling by Jefferson County Common Pleas Judge David Henderson.</p>
	<p>Henderson held a four-hour hearing Thursday on a request by attorney Gary Stern and his wife, April, for a permanent injunction stopping the use of the cameras. The city began using the Traffipax portable cameras on Sept. 22, but the practice was halted on Dec. 5 when Henderson issued a preliminary injunction. The cameras were mainly used on Lovers Lane, Ohio 7 and in front of Harding Middle School.</p>
	<p>Stern has maintained the city failed to follow its own ordinance by failing to publish notice of locations of the cameras; failing to erect conspicuous signs; and failing to maintain a list of locations to be monitored by the cameras. Stern also has alleged the traffic camera ordinance is unconstitutional because it makes a criminal offense a civil violation and violates the due process rights of the driver by allowing a city police officer to hear appeals of the tickets.</p>
	<p>The city, through Assistant Law Director Costa Mastros, has maintained the city can regulate street traffic because it has home-rule authority as a charter city.<br />
<a href="http://www.news-register.net/community/articles.asp?articleID=3387"><br />
<em><strong>Read Full Story&#8230;</strong></em></a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.camera-cops.com/index.php/ohio-valley-may-put-the-kabash-on-traffic-cameras/03/2006/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Wiretapping Laws a Blank Check for Snoops?</title>
		<link>http://www.camera-cops.com/index.php/new-wiretapping-laws-a-blank-check-for-snoops/03/2006/</link>
		<comments>http://www.camera-cops.com/index.php/new-wiretapping-laws-a-blank-check-for-snoops/03/2006/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 07:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Click Flash</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Surveillance</category>
	<category>Big Brother</category>
	<category>Police State</category>
	<category>Privacy</category>
	<category>Law</category>
		<guid>http://www.camera-cops.com/index.php/new-wiretapping-laws-a-blank-check-for-snoops/03/2006/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	Like the calvary rushing to the aid of the wrong troops, four Republican senators who had earlier declared battle against the Bush administration&#8217;s warrantless wiretapping have now proposed to give the surveillance program five years of near-bulletproof protection.
	The new measure by Mike DeWine of Ohio, Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, Chuck Hagel of Nebraska and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Like the calvary rushing to the aid of the wrong troops, four Republican senators who had earlier declared battle against the Bush administration&#8217;s warrantless wiretapping have now proposed to give the surveillance program five years of near-bulletproof protection.</p>
	<p>The new measure by Mike DeWine of Ohio, Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, Chuck Hagel of Nebraska and Olympia Snowe of Maine would significantly expand the administration&#8217;s power to intercept U.S. citizens&#8217; international phone calls and e-mails without obtaining a warrant — even when they have not been implicated in any crime. It also would let the surveillance continue with much less oversight than Congress demanded in previous laws.</p>
	<p><a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/opinion/la-ed-nsa12mar12,1,4153304,print.story?ctrack=1&#038;cset=true" title="Read Full Story HERE" target="_blank"><em><strong>Read Full Story&#8230;</strong></em></a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.camera-cops.com/index.php/new-wiretapping-laws-a-blank-check-for-snoops/03/2006/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Red Light Cameras May Be Coming to San Mateo</title>
		<link>http://www.camera-cops.com/index.php/red-light-cameras-may-be-coming-to-san-mateo/03/2006/</link>
		<comments>http://www.camera-cops.com/index.php/red-light-cameras-may-be-coming-to-san-mateo/03/2006/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 07:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Click Flash</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Traffic Cameras</category>
	<category>Red Light Cameras</category>
	<category>Photo Cops</category>
	<category>Big Brother</category>
	<category>Police State</category>
		<guid>http://www.camera-cops.com/index.php/red-light-cameras-may-be-coming-to-san-mateo/03/2006/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	Drivers rushing to and from Highway 101 on Millbrae Avenue should brace for an onslaught of traffic tickets about to be doled out by new red light cameras the City Council is expected to install.
	If approved at Tuesday’s City Council meeting, the red light cameras will be erected at the city’s largest intersection, where Millbrae [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Drivers rushing to and from Highway 101 on Millbrae Avenue should brace for an onslaught of traffic tickets about to be doled out by new red light cameras the City Council is expected to install.</p>
	<p>If approved at Tuesday’s City Council meeting, the red light cameras will be erected at the city’s largest intersection, where Millbrae Avenue, Rollins Road and Highway 101 meet.</p>
	<p>The city estimates it will <em><strong>make about $1.3 million a year</strong></em> by adding five cameras at the intersection. Each red light ticket carries a fine of $271 and the city receives about $147 of that. The city estimates the cameras will catch about 10 violators a day and take in a total of $1,764,000 a year. It will cost $318,000 a year to maintain the cameras and $100,000 to hire a police officer to be manage the program. The $100,000 will pay the officer’s salary and benefits.</p>
	<p>If approved Tuesday, Millbrae will be one of many Peninsula cities opting for red light cameras. Last year, the city of San Mateo approved cameras at some of its most dangerous intersections. San Mateo <em><a href="http://www.photoenforced.com/" title="Find Camera Interesctions" target="_blank">police will not disclose which intersections</a></em> the cameras are at, but previously said Hillsdale Boulevard and Saratoga Drive had 31 red light violations in a two-hour time frame during an informal study conducted in 2003.</p>
	<p><a href="http://www.smdailyjournal.com/article_preview.php?id=55903" title="Read Full Story HERE" target="_blank"><strong><em>Read Full Story&#8230;</em></strong></a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.camera-cops.com/index.php/red-light-cameras-may-be-coming-to-san-mateo/03/2006/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Some Southern States Rejecting Red Light Cameras</title>
		<link>http://www.camera-cops.com/index.php/some-southern-states-rejecting-red-light-cameras/03/2006/</link>
		<comments>http://www.camera-cops.com/index.php/some-southern-states-rejecting-red-light-cameras/03/2006/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 09:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Click Flash</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Surveillance</category>
	<category>Traffic Cameras</category>
	<category>Red Light Cameras</category>
	<category>Photo Cops</category>
	<category>Big Brother</category>
	<category>Citizens</category>
		<guid>http://www.camera-cops.com/index.php/some-southern-states-rejecting-red-light-cameras/03/2006/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	Red light camera proposals were rejected in one state and two cities yesterday.
	The Virginia House of Delegates defeated an effort to reinstate the controversial red light camera program that the legislature terminated last July. Senator Kenneth Stolle (R-Virginia Beach) had inserted a provision into an unrelated bill to reauthorize statewide photo ticketing and the bill [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Red light camera proposals were rejected in one state and two cities yesterday.</p>
	<p>The Virginia House of Delegates defeated an effort to reinstate the controversial red light camera program that the legislature terminated last July. Senator Kenneth Stolle (R-Virginia Beach) had inserted a provision into an unrelated bill to reauthorize statewide photo ticketing and the bill passed the Senate 31-8 last week. The measure died yesterday when House Speaker William J. Howell (R) ruled the amendment was not germane.</p>
	<p>In Kentucky, the Lexington-Fayette Urban County Council voted 13-2 to direct Mayor Teresa Isaac to drop the idea of installing red light cameras.</p>
	<p>Montgomery, Alabama&#8217;s city council also voted 5-4 to reject a measure to authorize red light cameras. <em>(see story below)</em></p>
	<p><a href="http://www.thenewspaper.com/news/10/1001.asp" title="Read Full Story HERE" target="_blank"><strong><em>Read Full Story&#8230;</em></strong></a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.camera-cops.com/index.php/some-southern-states-rejecting-red-light-cameras/03/2006/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>K.C. Public Speaks Out on Red Light Cameras</title>
		<link>http://www.camera-cops.com/index.php/kc-public-speaks-out-on-red-light-camers/03/2006/</link>
		<comments>http://www.camera-cops.com/index.php/kc-public-speaks-out-on-red-light-camers/03/2006/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 09:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Click Flash</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Surveillance</category>
	<category>Traffic Cameras</category>
	<category>Red Light Cameras</category>
	<category>Photo Cops</category>
	<category>Big Brother</category>
	<category>Law</category>
	<category>Citizens</category>
		<guid>http://www.camera-cops.com/index.php/kc-public-speaks-out-on-red-light-camers/03/2006/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	As it began exploring the use of red-light cameras Tuesday, the Kansas City Board of Police Commissioners heard from a skeptical public concerned about traffic enforcement and “Big Brother” surveillance.
	“I feel a human being can make a better judgment call than a camera,” Kansas City resident Lamar Mickens told the board during an evening public [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>As it began exploring the use of red-light cameras Tuesday, the Kansas City Board of Police Commissioners heard from a skeptical public concerned about traffic enforcement and “Big Brother” surveillance.</p>
	<p>“I feel a human being can make a better judgment call than a camera,” Kansas City resident Lamar Mickens told the board during an evening public forum at which about a dozen persons spoke.</p>
	<p>“This is an encroachment on freedom,” said Jim Stoll. “I find the Big Brother syndrome to be very distasteful to me.”</p>
	<p>A few speakers favored the cameras to deter what they see as a major cause of auto accidents. But the majority questioned whether the city is trying to protect the public or simply wants to increase revenues through more traffic tickets.</p>
	<p><a href="http://www.kansascity.com/mld/kansascity/news/14043207.htm?template=contentModules/printstory.jsp" title="Read Full Story HERE"><strong><em>Read Full Story&#8230;</em></strong></a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.camera-cops.com/index.php/kc-public-speaks-out-on-red-light-camers/03/2006/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
